Every murder is a
simplification. By being murdered, the interlocutor is deprived of any
possibility of arguing or counter-arguing. Conversely, for the murderer, the
probability of replying and counter-replying without any risk of interruption
reaches its maximum. The victim can neither rectify the subinterpretations nor
correct the overinterpretations due to the other one. He is, in terms of
argumentation, the simplest among all beings. He is the simplest because the
other one simplified him by murdering him; furthermore, he was murdered in
order to create the appropriate conditions so as to maximize a simplification
of reasons and wrongs. The end of “La Cuesta de las Comadres” stages all this from
the moment in which the murderer talks to the victim while his corpse is not
yet cold. And what he does is to argue, explain, justify the homicide. […]
El texto completo en el siguiente link:
